Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:50

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Doritos, Cheetos, M&Ms and other popular snacks will soon have warning labels in Texas - KHOU
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What is the scariest thing that ever happened in your life?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Which genre of novels is most profitable to publish and why?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
This email app is Gmail on steroids, and I can't recommend it enough - Android Police
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Mega Millions Jackpot Won in Virginia - Mega Millions
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?